bricology ([info]bricology) wrote,
@ 2009-01-26 13:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood:hung-over

History repeats -- and doesn't



I'm beginning to recognize that any annual event has a lifespan that is usually past long before the organizers and attendees get the memo to that effect. Consider Burning Man. Founded 23 years ago as something interesting to do, it soon became redefined as a "counter-culture movement" before mutating into a commercial juggernaut and hippie Mardi Gras with its own orthodoxy and lingo.

I actually attended Burning Mans ("Men"?) numbers two and three, out on the north end of Baker Beach, near the nude area. They were diverting and improvisational, and not at all nude. I shudder to consider what it's turned into, but the fact that it's now intentionally held in one of the most inhospitable, bleak landscapes in the Lower 48 is sufficient to keep me ignorant of its "charms".

The first of any such event is chaotic, inspired, unique. The second year allows more preparation and greater ambition. The third year is the full flowering, but a few slack-jawed gawkers are certain to turn up and put everyone off a bit. By this time, the media will have caught on, which does no one any good but the ticket-sellers. From then on, it's usually all downhill.

When I first heard of The Edwardian Ball, I thought -- "genius!" I'd long been a fan of Edward Gorey (I once telephoned and told him this, even though that information did not seem to much impress him), and I think that the Edwardian era produced some fabulous fashions. Given that Gorey's constructed universe is vaguely set in that era, it seemed an inspired combination. And indeed, the first Ball was a delight. The second one was a mixed bag, although my suffering from a delirium-inducing cold didn't help. But we decided to give it one more try.

And here is where history repeats. Like last time, we decided to portray characters from a Gorey book; this time, The Gilded Bat. Like last time, we put a considerable amount of effort into it. And like last time, the organizers, performers, and many of the attendees were largely disappointing. At least we didn't spring for the 3-day VIP pass this time. Wanting to maximize our chance of experiencing Gorey goodness, we just bought tickets to "Sunday, Gorey Sunday", which had the bonus of being the only night held in the beautiful Lodge of the Regency Center, once a Masonic lodge, with amazing painted scrims behind the stage. I cannot fault the location. Being patted down by Gangstas-R-Us Security Co. as we entered, however, I could've done very well without.

But once we entered the venue, we had guardedly high hopes. Then we noticed that there was no seating in the main room. Three hundred guests and no seating. For a four hour event. We found some carpeted steps to sit on. The people-watching was uneven, but at least a significant percentage of attendees were dressed in vaguely Edwardian costume; another significant percentage were utter punters, with rented tuxedos. There was a sizable steampunk contingent, in varying degrees of success, and a half-dozen vendors with their wares set up on tables in a side room. But one thing there wasn't, at least as far as I could see, was anything to do with Edward Gorey. I did not see one other person out of the 300 in the sold-out crowd who was dressed as a Gorey character. Perhaps a few were there; I did not see them, despite walking throughout the venue five or six times.

Mounted on the wall of the hallway was a cut-out of "Mirella Splatova", dressed in her costume as "the Gilded Bat". Kelly, in costume as Mlle. Splatova as "the Gilded Bat", happened to be standing in front of it at one point, when she was approached by some nameless drone. "Hey, are you from that movie 'Sleeper'?" he asked. As she stood in front of the picture of the character she portrayed. Of course, I didn't expect anyone to recognize my character, "Plastikoff", since he only appears in one frame of the story, but I was identifiably Gorey, right down to the dark lines drawn under my eyes. But "The Gilded Bat"? Surely anyone with any knowledge of Gorey would be familiar with that story, and would recognize her character. Apparently not.

Amazingly, [info]dandy_gregory somehow managed to recognize me as me (which is to say, "bricology"), in a cavernous, darkened room, and while I was in costume. Don't know how he did it, but it was nice to finally meet him in person, and the lovely [info]palefemme who was with him. They both looked perfectly suited to the evening. Kelly bumped into [info]missorangegirl whom, I have no doubt, was likewise perfectly turned out.

Of the performances we saw, the less I can say about them, the kinder. And I realize that Jim Sweeney is friends with friends of mine, and he may well be a perfectly lovely fellow in person, but why they ask him to emcee the Edwardian Ball, I shall never understand. At the very least, I wish that he didn't feel compelled to try to lead the audience in shouting "hip-hip-hooray!" every time he took the stage between acts (and on at least one occasion, twice in the same break!) There is only one thing more embarrassing than eliciting an unenthusiastic response to a call, and that's eliciting an enthusiastic response from rental tux-wearing frat boys from El Sobrante who are hoping to "hook up with one of those hot gothic girls". We did our best to drink away the lame, but the only reward for our efforts was an evil hangover this morning. And so we walked out during some nonsense or other, vowing that next year, history may well repeat itself again, but that we would not be there to witness it.

Anyway, I've used up a month's worth of venting credits. Here are some photos of the setting and our costumes, and I thank you for your patience in wading through the screed above.

Plastikoff, the creator of the ballet "The Gilded Bat"

Prima ballerina Mirella Splatova, as "the Gilded Bat"


weird scenes inside the Lodge















(18 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]simulacrum
2009-01-27 01:02 am UTC (link)
You two look adorable :)

Get the bad aftertaste out by doing something fantastic: going to Opera Plaza to see the amazing Scott Walker documentary. (That is, if you're a fan).

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bricology
2009-01-27 07:40 am UTC (link)
"You two look adorable :)

Aw, shucks -- thank you!

"Get the bad aftertaste out by doing something fantastic: going to Opera Plaza to see the amazing Scott Walker documentary. (That is, if you're a fan)."

Yes I am, but I had no idea that there was such a film! I can't listen to "The Drift" without feeling most peculiar, tho'.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]simulacrum
2009-01-27 08:15 am UTC (link)
It's only showing through Thursday, and then I think Landmark does the switch over to new films. Jesse and I saw it Sunday night. Go go go! I was... just moved. Beyond words. Such a good, well done documentary about a really interesting man.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bricology
2009-01-28 05:59 am UTC (link)
Thanks for the information! Hopefully we'll get to see it before it's gone.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ngakmafaery
2009-01-27 01:04 am UTC (link)
...I was just reading in someone's journal that she, hired to teach/assist dancing (I believe) at this event, felt it should have been called more like "Edwardian Something-Not-Resembling-Dancing-So-Much", due to some sort of crowd-control/direction issues and lack of cohesion and point...and no seats!!! That's really too bad...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bricology
2009-01-27 08:02 am UTC (link)
"...I was just reading in someone's journal that she, hired to teach/assist dancing (I believe) at this event, felt it should have been called more like "Edwardian Something-Not-Resembling-Dancing-So-Much", due to some sort of crowd-control/direction issues and lack of cohesion and point...and no seats!!! That's really too bad..."

Well, some of my complaint may be due to no longer being willing to sit on floors like I might have if I were 18 again. I've gotten spoiled in my old age.

I can't speak to the dancing very much since (a) we didn't dance and (b) for the time that we were there, there was very little dancing. Some of the people that I saw dance were quite good, tho'.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ngakmafaery
2009-01-28 12:14 am UTC (link)
...the idea I got from her is that there had been substantially more dancing planned or expected, but that out-of-control folks prevented that by their activities or lack of being effectively corralled...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lord_whimsy
2009-01-27 01:17 am UTC (link)
Hahah! You babies look great.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bricology
2009-01-27 07:38 am UTC (link)
"Hahah! You babies look great."

Heh! I can't believe how weirdly skinny I look in the first photo! I'm like the fellow who turned sideways and disappeared. And I thought that horizontal stripes were supposed to be widening!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dandy_gregory
2009-01-27 03:30 am UTC (link)
It was a pleasure to meet you both!
I was in fact Palefemme who first recognized you, and I simply confirmed her recognition; I must say both of your costumes looked great.

If you only went on Sunday I would beg you to hold you judgment on the event until perhaps next year when you can attend the "main evenings", from one who attended all three nights, Sunday was MERDE!
I wanted to see Fou Fou Ha who were wonderful last year, and Pelefemme wanted to kill me the longer she stayed. Once we saw them, who only got 5 minuted of stage time as compared with 20-30 minutes given to *FAR* lesser acts, we left in disgust.

The ball overall was fantastic! Friday night was steampunk night. Which much as you may love or hate SP it was pretty and the acts were decent.
Saturday was fantastique!
We danced for the first 2 hours [on a relatively free dance floor] and then the acts started. Jill Tracy has mastered her art to a degree I had not previously seen, and Rosen Coven [for whom I have no affection] were the perfect compliment to Vau de Vire.
The weekend was actually quite pleasant, I'm sorry you only saw Sunday

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bricology
2009-01-28 05:58 am UTC (link)
I'm glad to read that you had a very different (positive) experience! I've just prowled through Flickr's images from the weekend, and it looks -- perversely enough -- like far more people were dressed a la Gorey on Friday and Saturday nights, rather than on "Sunday, Gorey Sunday". Go forth and figure.

I feel about steampunk the way I feel about burle-que -- when it's done very well, it's amazing; when it's anything less, it's an embarrassment. [info]occlupanid's wonderful "GoreyScope" is, I would say, the height of the style, and I regret not having seen it again this year.

Perhaps in retrospect, we should've just attended the first two nights.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lost_ligeia
2009-01-27 11:10 am UTC (link)
I feel a little less sore now about not having been able to go. It looked very promising, especially given the bands who performed.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bricology
2009-01-28 06:04 am UTC (link)
Well, apparently my mistake was in attending the wrong night! -as [info]dandy_gregory described the previous two nights' offerings (and as supported by the photos on Flickr). Damn my psychic powers for failing me!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lupoleboucher
2009-01-27 06:41 pm UTC (link)
Neat costumes. Yeah, ole Kingfish (and one of his giant pals) seems to be involved in every Bay Area event combining a high probability of both neckties and fishnet stockings. I suppose it is nice there are such things out there, though I'm not surprised the quality is low. His Burlesque shows in Oakland are amusing for Camp value, but the horrible people who go to them make them not worth attending. I figure most people are into this sort of thing from watching some or other ridiculous Hollyweird costume epic, sort of like the way Goth and Satanism became popular when Marylin Manson got a top-40 record. Honestly, the average of humanity is so abysmally low, it doesn't matter what Aesthetic you try to cater to, the event will be horrible.
The few events I've been to as an adult which are at all worthwhile are put on by remnants of the upper classes from a dead age, like the Remembrance Day celebration you mentioned a few months ago. Everything else, from Goth to Burning Man is just rehashed Hollyweird costume aesthetics with no culture to back it up.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bricology
2009-01-28 06:17 am UTC (link)
"Neat costumes."

Thanks! However, I'll be just as happy if I never paint another stripe on a shirt or have to cobble together one more half-assed shoe.

"Yeah, ole Kingfish (and one of his giant pals) seems to be involved in every Bay Area event combining a high probability of both neckties and fishnet stockings."

I simply don't get his incessant "Hip-hip-hooray!" nonsense. It's like when a performer tries to coax cheers or applause from an audience by rolling his arms (does that gesture have a name?) It takes a certain force of wit to be a good emcee, not just an affinity for the subject matter and a hammy disposition. "Master of Ceremonies"? More like "Cheerleader-in-Chief".

"I suppose it is nice there are such things out there, though I'm not surprised the quality is low. His Burlesque shows in Oakland are amusing for Camp value, but the horrible people who go to them make them not worth attending. I figure most people are into this sort of thing from watching some or other ridiculous Hollyweird costume epic, sort of like the way Goth and Satanism became popular when Marylin Manson got a top-40 record. Honestly, the average of humanity is so abysmally low, it doesn't matter what Aesthetic you try to cater to, the event will be horrible. The few events I've been to as an adult which are at all worthwhile are put on by remnants of the upper classes from a dead age, like the Remembrance Day celebration you mentioned a few months ago. Everything else, from Goth to Burning Man is just rehashed Hollyweird costume aesthetics with no culture to back it up."

All too true.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]belhonorine
2009-01-28 02:12 am UTC (link)
Great costumes! The lodge looks like a beautiful place for an event, too bad they couldn't come up with some chairs.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bricology
2009-01-28 06:24 am UTC (link)
"Great costumes!"

Thank you!

The chair thing: this was one of the main reasons that we were willing to give this year a try, after last year's debacle -- because (we reasoned) being held in the Regency's Lodge (rather than the smaller Great American Music Hall, as in previous years) meant that, for once, there would be ample seating. And it turned out that we were right -- if by "ample" we meant "none".

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]missorangegirl
2009-02-03 03:16 am UTC (link)
Sorry I missed you. It was delightful to see Kelly!
I remember your story from last year, and I'm sorry to hear it was even more disappointing this time around.

I thought the event was rather awful, too.
I couldn't stand the music - perhaps it was just my mood.
The only redeeming qualities were 1. seeing the gorgeous scrims and 2. finally giving up on the show to goof around and take photos in one of the other rooms.

I didn't attend the other nights this year, but KSW brought steam toys again this year and ran a sewing machine from them.
I've enjoyed the Saturday night before, and hoped that the crowd would be a more reasonable fit in the new venue. Not sure if I'll plan to go next year.

(Reply to this)


(18 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…